Wednesday, April 13, 2011
The Woman of Syrophoenician Origin
Hi all! I figured I'd dive in with a Gospel passage that has been troubling me for a few weeks now. I have copied the story of the Woman of Syrophoenician Origin below along with the reflection I received with it. It has been a struggle for me on a couple of levels. Primarily, the cold response Jesus has to the woman. It's not the warm and fluffy welcoming Jesus I'm used to. Secondly, the idea that Jesus came to only for the House of Israel. I'd love to know your responses to this passage and any clarity you might offer. Thanks! PASSAGE: From there he set out and went away to the region of Tyre. He entered a house and did not want anyone to know he was there. Yet he could not escape notice, but a woman whose little daughter had an unclean spirit immediately heard about him, and she came and bowed down at his feet.Now the woman was a Gentile, of Syrophoenician origin. She begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter. He said to her, “Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” But she answered him, “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”Then he said to her, “For saying that, you may go—the demon has left your daughter.” So she went home, found the child lying on the bed, and the demon gone. Mk 7:24-30 REFLECTION: Worth The Risk “A ship wrecked off the New England coast many years ago. A young member of the coast guard rescue crew said, “We can’t go out. We’ll never get back.” The grizzled old captain replied, “We have to go out. We don’t have to come back.” (sermonillustrations.com; source unknown) You can live on bland food so as to avoid an ulcer; drink no tea or coffee or other stimulants, in the name of health; go to bed early and stay away from night life; avoid all controversial subjects so as never to give offense; mind your own business and avoid involvement in other people’s problems; spend money only on necessities and save all you can. You can still break your neck in the bathtub, and it will serve you right.” (Eileen Guder, God, But I’m Bored, quoted in Holy Sweat, Tim Hansel, 1987, Word Books Publisher, p. 48) Some things are worth the risk. Such a conviction is surely what motivates the Canaanite woman, a Gentile, who begs a favor of a Jewish healer. If she knows anything about Jews, she must realize that she is likely to be rebuffed. But this is probably not the only risk she takes. Where is her husband, the child’s father? Why hasn’t he come as head of the family to seek out the healer? Perhaps he deems it beneath his dignity to behold himself to a Jew. Or maybe there is no husband – she is a widow or woman who has had a child out of wedlock. In either case, her situation is precarious. She is a woman without the protection of a man.At first the encounter between Jesus and this Gentile woman proceeds as one might anticipate. She makes her request, asks Jesus to cast the demon out of her daughter, and he refuses in an insulting manner: “Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” To this day in the Middle East the epithet “dog” is reserved for those beneath consideration as human beings, as in “infidel dog.” In effect, Jesus announces that His healing is only for the house of Israel; it cannot be wasted on outsiders of no consequence.What follows is entirely unexpected. Rather than cringing and slinking away like a dog, the woman retorts, “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.” It is a gutsy performance. Jesus sees her great faith and tells the woman, “For saying that you may go—-the demon has left your daughter.”And so we ask ourselves, “What is worth the risk?” When nothing is at stake and we sit on the bench critiquing others, it’s so easy to feel smug and assured of our own courage. Like the Canaanite woman, we need to decide when to step up. When do we take on the risk of losses that would bring us to our knees? Only through vigilant prayer and communal support can we shackle our fear and confront the demons of belittlement and injustice. Kathleen M. Sullivan ’82MA ’87PhD
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I just ran across something today that was describing how scholarly learning was carried out in the Middle Ages (I believe): the teacher would read the original work, then what other scholars before him had commented about the work, then finally add his own thoughts and viola! learning was complete! Seemed an appropriate side note to our work here...
ReplyDeleteBecoming a teacher for a high school freshman New Testament class has provided a bit of an adventure in scripture interpretation. While I am tempted to 'accidentally' skip over stories that I don't have an answer for so I don't have to be questioned about 'what does it mean', occasionally I try to be gutsy enough to say "I don't know. What do YOU think?" (which earns me silence and blank stares, but maybe someday...). This would have been one of those passages for me.
What I end up saying a lot is "that would have taken a lot of faith". The story of Zaccheus for instance, where a short fellow scrambles up the tree to see Jesus when he passes by. I do see what the reflection is talking about when it points out that the woman must have had courage and faith to say something that bold to 1- a man 2- a Jew and 3-someone who essentially just told her to go away and shut up.
Maybe it could be a lesson in social justice. What should you do, Jesus questions us, in unjust societies, when the rich oppress the poor and people take advantage of one another and slap each other in the face and tell you that you don't belong here with 'good' people, all under the guise of law? Show them the truth with your uncanny courage. Be assertive. When someone calls you less than human, you should tell them (or show them!) that you're not.
Maybe this is kind of a strange way of looking at Jesus. Maybe only a slightly evil teacher -like myself, and unlike Jesus- would teach a lesson by becoming the very thing he or she was preaching against. At a summer camp I used to work at we had what I liked to call "oppression day" where we taught the kids about social injustices by subjecting them to some sort of mild oppression. Anger is a strong emotion and one that I'm sure caused a memorable experience for them that day. In today's world, especially with high school students, making them angry by doing something we weren't 'supposed' to be doing, was an excellent teaching tool.
I can see the lesson that Christians 2000 years later can gain from this exchange, and I could read that lesson into Jesus' original words, but maybe that's putting something into Jesus' mouth that wasn't actually there? I can hardly be so bold as the Syrophoenician woman and say that about a man I believe to be somewhat more than human...
I don't think we can take every story about Jesus as a model for how to live our life or as having something specific to teach us. The Gospels were written for a specific audience by a specific person, likewise with the Old Testament. We don't have access to the world of ancient Palestine, but we can use stories like this one to teach us what it was like. We can ask questions about the situations in which Jesus found himself, examining our own life in light of Jesus' actions, but we shouldn't expect a lesson to always present itself.
ReplyDeleteDo we have to believe that if Jesus is God and God is perfect that Jesus is perfect too?
ReplyDeleteDoes perfect imply applicable everywhere? Can it be context dependent? Just because it was the right decision back then, does that make it the right one now?
ReplyDeleteI would think that perfection does imply a sense of timelessness. And that Jesus' perfection would tend to suggest that perfection often isn't viewed as the "right thing to do" in the time when it's done.
ReplyDeleteIn my own interpretation of "perfection," I think I often assume even-temperedness and an unceasing compassion that manifests as patience and gentleness. This assumption is why I tend to struggle with the stories where Jesus doesn't seem as gentle or even where he gets angry. Yet, in such cases perhaps that is perfection. If we all find Grace in different ways, maybe Jesus' varried responses indicate that even some "impolite" or more abrupt behaviors/responses can be perfect for salvation?